vendor finance Videos
Watching: Kim dotcom vs corzine and modern day letters of marque
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Critical Thinking w Dr E. Hale (with, a talk on democracy) Posted by: wepollock
Video duration: 1318 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Vendor finance videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: MartinMouseBrave. on 08 Feb 12, 11:14:18
So the question is: what entity is giving out these letters of marque, and? how do we discipline this entity in order to force it to alter its behavior?
By: rich2rock. on 31 Jan 12, 23:51:48
Yes, we don't go into a Swiss bank and confiscate accounts because of what's in them. This is the? same situation here.
By: soflynnirl. on 27 Jan 12, 18:43:31
I love listening to smart people like you, very? interesting.
By: bullsnutsoz. on 26 Jan 12, 02:33:55
When we look behind the curtain we find? the greasy hand of the Royals everwhere we look
By: MrFatterson. on 25 Jan 12, 19:29:51
Just an illustration to where this inevitably leads: Article on Techdirt:? Feds Falsely Censor Popular Blog For Over A Year, Deny All Due Process, Hide All Details Law cap. Lack of due process. Arbitrary action. From the article: "Even worse, about the only evidence that ICE had that these songs were infringing was the word of the "VP of Anti-Piracy Legal Affairs for the RIAA," Carlos Linares, who was simply not in a position to know if the songs were infringing or authorized."
By: MrFatterson. on 25 Jan 12, 19:06:24
thank you for your knowledgeable response: so it's "probable cause" vs.? "preponderance of the evidence" sounds like: "lawless" and "law cap" vs. "not free" and "subject to random action"
By: wepollock. on 25 Jan 12, 17:28:58
@MrFattersonThere are two types of forfeiture cases, criminal and civil. Almost all forfeiture cases practiced today are civil. In civil forfeiture cases, the US Government sues the item of property, not the person; the owner is effectively a third party claimant. Once the government establishes probable cause that the property is subject to? forfeiture, the owner must prove on a "preponderance of the evidence" that it is not. The owner need not be judged guilty of any crime.
By: MrFatterson. on 25 Jan 12, 17:25:51
What is the legal process that was used to seize his property, although this individual is not yet convicted of anything? Has his property been seized temporarily? Why has his property been seized? I really don't understand how this can happen in the free countries of the West? Mustn't he be considered innocent until proved guilty by a? court of law after the appropriate legal proceedings? Confusing ... what happened here?
By: happionecom. on 25 Jan 12, 14:53:22
May I? suggest that people watch you tube JeepersMedia regarding cnet and all the illegal down loads and more.
By: slobomotion. on 25 Jan 12, 10:32:33
Contingency work is not legal here. We are not under Anglo-Saxon law.?
By: slobomotion. on 25 Jan 12, 05:35:07
I am not in a State, I am in France. New York State, yes, that is where I contacted people and they kept telling me too much time has gone by and they won't touch it.? xo
By: xmenrus. on 25 Jan 12, 04:56:46
Very astute observations..The more things change in the western? countries, for 500 years, the more they stay the same..by Davy Jones' locker!!! HAR HAR matey!!!
By: PepLacy. on 24 Jan 12, 18:36:46
- Have you contacted an Advocacy center in your state? Also checkout an organization called legal-aid dotorg & read their "ourmission" page. ? Wish you well.
By: slobomotion. on 24 Jan 12, 18:23:06
The case goes back more than ten years and no one in the US will even take it on contingency, I have tried. They don't do contingency at all in France, I have to pay 150 euros for a face to face with my lawyer and she gives me a? break, the normal rate is 200.
By: PepLacy. on 24 Jan 12, 18:21:06
- Hire a lawyer who will work for 30% of? the pot, and nothing if he loses your case. It's the only way to go.
By: slobomotion. on 24 Jan 12, 18:00:28
Did that in two countries. Cost me a fortune. They just? took my money and brushed me off.
By: PepLacy. on 24 Jan 12, 17:55:44
-? Hire a lawyer.
By: PepLacy. on 24 Jan 12, 17:54:19
Feds claim? that Kim was seeking and paying for hot copies of pirated material to his site. Of coarse, he could have been set up by jealous/envy, enemy, or someone trying to save their own ass. He should have known better. Another Leona Helmsley saga. He should have known better, should been driving a plain Ford truck with hand crank windows ;)
By: kileer7. on 24 Jan 12, 12:13:45
Filesonic and Fileserve,? both websites are cyberlockers, are changing their behavior in response to the draconian crackdown on Kim dotcom.
By: slobomotion. on 24 Jan 12, 09:11:12
Yup. US Soc Sec admits they owe me back disability benefits and a stipend, but they have lost my dossiers three times already. I cannot demand any French doctor to fill out a form in? English and it is actually illegal for them to even talk to another French doctor or anyone else about my health. I wrote to Obama in 2010 and offered to cash out and renounce. No answer except for me to ask for another form! I did. No answer.
By: joel1923. on 24 Jan 12, 07:18:02
I file taxes every year, as required by law. Anything under 80,000$ is not taxed by the US gov't (depending on double-taxation agreements and time spent outside the US, etc). Even if you renounce US? citizenship, you should still get benefits. Mexican nationals do...
By: slobomotion. on 24 Jan 12, 06:54:11
Uprated.?
By: slobomotion. on 24 Jan 12, 06:53:19
I am an American expat and now French, too. I saw this sneaky kind of crap starting years ago, the US Dept of the Treasury wanting to know more and more about my bank accounts here, beyond just what I earn, which I do report honestly. I felt I should not do that because my spouse is fully French and our accts are joint and I have no right to disclose his info to a? govt he is not a part of. Well, if I renounce it now costs me 450 USD!
By: fullclipaudio. on 24 Jan 12, 05:18:53
It really all comes down to money. If I were really wealthy, I would live in a small town. I could afford to buy off a few officials and, get this, I could get away? with murder. After all, a small town prosecuting attorney is gonna have a hard time with me given that I could drop more than his yearly budget. I can have a dozen lawyers running his entire office in circles. That is why you do not see any rich people on death row. Very few in prison either.