vendor finance Videos
Watching: Wealth destruction 2
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Surface Integral Ex3 part 4 - Home Stretch Posted by: khanacademy
Video duration: 242 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Vendor finance videos :: Social Bookmarking 
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
:: Videos are copyright their respective owners :: Design by: Css
Latest comments made on this video:
By: gv1256. on 25 May 12, 16:04:26
Brilliant videos.? Thanks for sharing knowledge.
By: UmTheMuse. on 14 May 12, 21:36:10
The problem is that the consumables are sunk into inefficient allocations and can't (easily) be? reallocated. People bought consumer goods with the idea that they were *investing*. Yes, the construction workers et al made money, but it's only transferred money, not an actual increase in people's well-being. An equal amount of money got thrown out the window when the house was foreclosed, btw.
By: Dmi3Animation. on 14 May 12, 19:44:43
why did last video was removed? it sounds like the most important part? of playlist. Mr. Khan, were you threatened for the content with solution out of this mess?
By: Empty Buckets. on 12 May 12, 06:47:18
No the banks didn't lose but the depositors did and so did all the? 401ks and pension funds that bought the toxic debts.
By: nokkont. on 19 Apr 12, 19:32:24
Gays check out how to become popular Russian invention /watch?v=Y-pztzYMasA&feature=g-upl&context=G2f02875AUAAAAAAAAAA?
By: Apsolutni. on 28 Mar 12, 13:32:06
The bank did not loose anything. The? 500k issued as loans were most likely created out of thin air and backed by nothing. So the banks didn't really loose anything, as they usually never do.
By: D4rkJOKER1. on 28 Feb 12, 02:25:14
FUCKING GRANITE COUNTERTOPS! THE? BANE OF OUR EXISTANCE!
By: ivanjrt. on 14 Feb 12, 15:03:25
You might also add the fact that the givernment played a very important role in creating this unjustified apreciation in prices. Businesses have to compete? against each other to stay profitable, the gov created insentives that were not in place before and caused banks to take change their way of lending.
By: OnlyWay93. on 28 Dec 11, 03:55:21
Sal,? you need to endorse Ron Paul!
By: abvmoose87. on 02 Dec 11, 15:30:46
So? the lesson is don't take home equity loans?
By: PunjabiSikhRajput1. on 25 Oct 11, 20:39:16
He learned? this from Peter Schiff
By: tIs4gatorbait. on 14 Jul 11, 02:41:11
its not like money spent on consumables is thrown into an incinerator,? it goes to those providing the good/service who then in turn spend it on something and so on. in all likelihood it is invested at some point. ive so far failed to see the problem
By: tIs4gatorbait. on 14 Jul 11, 02:26:17
I thought I was the only? one. The audio is messed up a bit
By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:33:32
It goes to the service economy. It does not go towards production of anything, rather it goes to a contractor who is probably getting rich in these boom cycles. That's fine, that's capitalism, but Sal is saying that 500k loan would have been better utilized by a new medical startup company that would employ people for example. I'm pretty sure that? new countertops do not boost GDP numbers.
By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:28:22
Like Peter Schiff says, once China realizes they don't have to make our crap anymore and turn? their production inwards towards their own consumption, China will be the new global superpower and frankly won't need the USA for anything.
By: mjaeger311. on 22 Jun 11, 02:24:28
Awesome assessment and good points re: government. You must be a? Ron Paul fan!
By: evilsidd. on 13 Jun 11, 04:42:24
did no one notice him going? through puberty between 2.20 - 2.30
By: frother. on 30 Mar 11, 01:56:18
yeah we know we just watched the? video this isnt a review box
By: MrBipBipp. on 29 Mar 11, 22:23:34
How was exactly the wealth destroyed? When using lent money? to go on vacations or to "improve" your house, it goes to whoever sold you those goods and services o.0 Did I miss something?
By: FortNikitaBullion. on 18 Mar 11, 07:23:57
Why don't we just make? people liable for their poor decisions, let them pay back what they're underwater by. No bailouts, no moral hazard, and people will wake up overnight and stop taking ungodly risks.
By: degauze. on 12 Mar 11, 03:25:48
Mind? blowing.
By: tekcuriousjoe. on 17 Feb 11, 00:52:17
Plain and simple: GREED, GREED and GREED. It's part of the capitalism, everything goes up must eventually comes down. If one failure to identify when is the peak or over value, will pay? the price. Gov't shouldn't step in bail them out. They deserve it.
By: llarose. on 05 Feb 11, 07:15:56
I attribute this problem mostly to the? baby-boomer attitude.
By: tiblon1. on 23 Dec 10, 14:30:20
?????? ????? ??????? ?????? 17%. ?? ??.? ??? ???????? ?? ???????????. ?????????? 25%.? ?????? ????????.? (495)2200660 2200660@mail.ru
By: D4niZeDog. on 17 Dec 10, 20:37:43
So what went wrong here? I don't have the answer, but I think people are very busy trying? to point out who is responsible (though i reckon it should be done), or to say that the "system" is wrong and will lead us all to an unavoidable and painful end. But I think few people try to make this system work correctly (like you would learn to drive a car). So thanks again for explaining these mechanics.