vendor finance Videos
Watching: The end of affordability part 4
Video scenes shots:

Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![]() |
The End of Affordability Part 5 Posted by: Wildhiland
Video duration: 255 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |


Latest comments made on this video:
By: Wildhiland. on 24 Oct 09, 01:50:33
I said your comment was moronic, i.e. "Is it near hogwash?" This does not necessarily apply to yourself. There are a number of alternatives which I am sure you and many other people are aware of. However, living in apartment blocks up to 25 levels high is not a very desirable way for the masses as you call them to live. The majority of people coming to Australia are trying to get away from? the horrors of overcrowded cities and sub-standard accommodation, not be faced with the problem again.
By: Wildhiland. on 16 Oct 09, 11:31:38
No it is not. But? your moronic comment is.
By: 3DegreeSydney. on 01 Jan 09, 07:40:15
Sydney's urban sprawl has practically wiped out what is left of the Cumberland Plain Woodland ecology. Further land release on the suburban fringe in the South West, West and North West will destroy the majority of what unprotected bush areas are left, e.g. former ADI site at St. Mary's. The same has occurred in Melbourne where a large area of untouched and rare grasslands on former? RAAF land has recently been given over to a sprawling development of detached dwellings. Sprawl kills bushland!
By: Wildhiland. on 31 Oct 08, 11:57:06
Great youve taken time to? record these comments. Property speculation has spread like a disease over the past 20 years. Now every man & his dog is involved in negative gearing, which pushes prices up, & forces people to become life-long renters because they can't afford inflated housing prices. It creates a vicious circle; & the argument that subsidised investment leads to more rental properties is a joke! In addition, those that pay the full rate of tax are forced to subsidise this nonsense.
By: benaurelius. on 14 Aug 08, 19:37:43
The problem is the people who legislate building code, recieve information on products supplied to the building industry by the manafacturers and distibutors of the product. This world wide mafia type approach to the building industry makes me sick to the stomach.I live now near Vienna in Austria and it is all organised the same way. The building magnates own the products the building industry uses. Supply the industry then cream it all with land sales than leave us all in? the lurch afterwards
By: Wildhiland. on 10 Apr 08, 23:41:53
Reusable or alternative energy is certainly worthwhile considering. However, experience indicates that apartment developers are primarily interested in maximising their profits while leaving others (the public) to pay the real cost of inadequate or outdated infrastructure, i.e. coal fired power stations, clogged roads and crowded public transport. The NSW State Government, the Department of Planning and the RTA seem quite? happy for this to continue.
By: benzone50. on 10 Mar 08, 18:12:49
makes me think that reusable energy should be a manditory solution with new housing developements! a small saving on the environment by each unit, but added up, it does make an effect on a whole population, such as sydney. what? do you think? ben.
By: Wildhiland. on 25 Nov 07, 00:17:06
The population issue also needs to be considered. Australia needs to have a sustainable population policy? at the Federal Government level.
By: EnviroWarrior10. on 24 Nov 07, 04:14:06
Urban densification is not the answer nor is releasing more land and continuing urban sprawl. The only other answer is population control. I.E. Stop building more housing altogether and? thus preventing more people settling in already overcroweded subrubs.